[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
:: صفحه اصلي :: درباره نشريه :: آخرين شماره :: تمام شماره‌ها :: جستجو :: ثبت نام :: ارسال مقاله :: تماس با ما ::
بخش‌های اصلی
صفحه اصلی::
اطلاعات نشریه::
آرشیو مجله و مقالات::
برای نویسندگان::
برای داوران::
ثبت نام و اشتراک::
تماس با ما::
تسهیلات پایگاه::
بایگانی مقالات زیر چاپ::
::
::
شماره‌های چاپ شده

فایل لیست داوران مقالات 

دوره چهاردهم سال 1404
شماره اول
شماره دوم

دوره سیزدهم سال 1403
شماره اول
شماره دوم

دوره دوازدهم سال 1402
شماره اول
شماره دوم

دوره یازدهم سال 1401
شماره اول
شماره دوم
دوره دهم سال 1400
شماره اول
شماره دوم
دوره نهم سال 1399
شماره اول
شماره دوم
دوره هشتم سال 1398
شماره اول
شماره دوم

دوره هفتم سال 1397
دوره ششم سال 1396
دوره پنجم سال 1395
دوره چهارم سال 1394
دوره سوم سال 1393
دوره دوم سال 1392
دوره اول سال 1391
..
راهنمای نگارش
..
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
دریافت اطلاعات پایگاه
نشانی پست الکترونیک خود را برای دریافت اطلاعات و اخبار پایگاه، در کادر زیر وارد کنید.
..
:: دوره 13، شماره 1 - ( 3-1403 ) ::
جلد 13 شماره 1 صفحات 140-128 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
نقش حافظه تنش در تطبیق گیاهان به شرایط تنش خشکی: رویکردها و چشم اندازهای مولکولی
رسمیه حمید ، فاطمه سعیدنیا*
بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مشهد، ایران ، f.saeidnia@areeo.ac.ir
چکیده:   (1625 مشاهده)
تنش‌های محیطی که در نتیجه ناهنجاری‌های اقلیمی و تغییرات زیست‌محیطی رخ می‌دهند، اغلب اثرات منفی بر رشد، عملکرد و بقای گیاهان دارند. این اثرات شامل کاهش رشد، کاهش بهره‌وری، آسیب‌های جبران‌ناپذیر و حتی مرگ گیاهان است. با این‌حال، در برخی شرایط خاص، تنش‌ها می‌توانند موجب تقویت برخی ویژگی‌های گیاه شوند، به‌ویژه هنگام مواجهه با تنش خشکی. واکنش گیاهان به تنش شامل مجموعه‌ای از تغییرات مورفولوژیکی، بیوشیمیایی، فیزیولوژیکی و متابولیکی است که به آن‌ها امکان سازگاری و بقا در شرایط تنش‌زا را می‌دهد. یکی از مهم‌ترین این سازوکارها، "حافظه تنش" است که گیاهان را برای پاسخ‌های سریع‌تر و مؤثرتر به مواجهه‌های مکرر با تنش‌های مشابه آماده می‌سازد. حافظه تنش، نتیجه تنظیمات پیچیده در سطوح مولکولی و اپی‌ژنتیکی است. این تنظیمات شامل تغییرات در بیان RNAهای کدکننده و غیرکدکننده، متیلاسیونDNA، تغییرات هیستون، بازسازی کروماتین و تعدیل سطح فیتوهورمون‌ها می‌باشد. این حافظه به دو شکل اصلی بروز می‌کند: (1) فعال‌سازی یا سرکوب پایدار ژن‌ها حتی پس از حذف عامل تنش، و (2) پاسخ اصلاح‌شده و تقویت‌شده به تنش‌های مکرر در مقایسه با گیاهانی که پرایم نشده‌اند. در این مطالعه، نقش عوامل ژنتیکی و اپی‌ژنتیکی در ایجاد حافظه تنش خشکی و پرایمینگ سوماتیکی مورد بحث قرار گرفته است. همچنین، مکانیسم‌های مرتبط با تنظیم اپی‌ژنتیکی، رونویسی و سازگاری متابولیکی در گیاهانی که با تنش خشکی مکرر مواجه شده‌اند، بررسی شده است. هدف این مطالعه، ارائه درک عمیق‌تر از سازوکارهای حافظه تنش خشکی و بررسی قابلیت بهره‌برداری از آن‌ها در اصلاح نباتات به‌منظور افزایش تحمل خشکی است. این دانش می‌تواند به توسعه ابزارهای ژنتیکی و تکنیک‌های اصلاحی مؤثر برای بهبود توانایی گیاهان در مواجهه با تغییرات محیطی منجر شود.
 
واژه‌های کلیدی: پرایمینگ، حافظه تنش، خشکی، کروماتین، متیلاسیون DNA
متن کامل [PDF 833 kb]   (224 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: مروری | موضوع مقاله: مهندسی ژنتیک گیاهی
دریافت: 1403/1/28 | پذیرش: 1403/6/23 | انتشار: 1403/6/29
فهرست منابع
1. Akhter, Z., Bi, Z., Ali, K., Sun, C., Fiaz, S., Haider, F. U., & Bai, J. (2021). In response to abiotic stress, DNA methylation confers epigenetic changes in plants. Plants, 10 (6), 1096. [DOI:10.3390/plants10061096] [PMID] []
2. Auler, P. A., do Amaral, M. N., Braga, E. J. B., & Maserti, B. (2021). Drought stress memory in rice guard cells: Proteome changes and genomic stability of DNA. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 169, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.10.028 [DOI:10.1016/J.PLAPHY.2021.10.028] [PMID]
3. Banerjee, A., & Roychoudhury, A. (2017). Epigenetic regulation during salinity and drought stress in plants: Histone modifications and DNA methylation. Plant Gene, 11, 199-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.plgene.2017.05.011]
4. Bannister, A. J., & Kouzarides, T. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Research, 21, 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22 [DOI:10.1038/cr. 2011.22] [PMID] []
5. Beckers, G. J. M., Jaskiewicz, M., Liu, Y., Underwood, W. R., He, S. Y., Zhang, S., & Conrath, U. (2009). Mitogen-activated protein kinases 3 and 6 are required for full priming of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell, 21, 944-953. [DOI:10.1105/tpc.108.062158] [PMID] []
6. Berger, S. L. (2007). The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature, 447, 407-412. [DOI:10.1038/nature05915] [PMID]
7. Berry, S., & Dean, C. (2015). Environmental perception and epigenetic memory: mechanistic insight through FLC. Plant Journal, 83, 133-148. [DOI:10.1111/tpj.12869] [PMID] []
8. Berry, S., Hartley, M., Olsson, T. S., Dean, C., & Howard, M. (2015). Local chromatin environment of a Polycomb target gene instructs its own epigenetic inheritance. Elife, 4, e07205. [DOI:10.7554/eLife.07205] [PMID] []
9. Bruce, T. J., Matthes, M. C., Napier, J. A., & Pickett, J. A. (2007). Stressful "memories" of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Science, 173, 603-608. [DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.09.002]
10. Chakrabortee, S., Byers, J. S., Jones, S., Garcia, D. M., Bhullar, B., Chang, A., She, R., Lee, L., Fremin, B., Lindquist, S., & Jarosz, D. F. (2016). Intrinsically disordered proteins drive emergence and inheritance of biological traits. Cell, 167, 369-381. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.017] [PMID] []
11. Chen, S., Dang, D., Liu, Y., Ji, S., Zheng, H., Zhao, C., Dong, X., Li, C., Guan, Y., & Zhang, A. (2023). Genome-wide association study presents insights into the genetic architecture of drought tolerance in maize seedlings under field water-deficit conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1165582. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1165582] [PMID] []
12. Chung, S., Kwon, C., & Lee, J.-H. (2022). Epigenetic control of abiotic stress signaling in plants. Genes & Genomics, 44, 267-278. [DOI:10.1007/s13258-021-01163-3] [PMID]
13. Conrath, U. (2011). Molecular aspects of defence priming. Trends in Plant Science, 16, 524-531. [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.004] [PMID]
14. Crisp, P. A., Ganguly, D., Eichten, S. R., Borevitz, J. O., & Pogson, B. J. (2016). Reconsidering plant memory: intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Science Advances, 2 (2), e1501340. [DOI:10.1126/sciadv.1501340] [PMID] []
15. de Freitas Guedes, F. A., Menezes-Silva, P. E., DaMatta, F. M., & Alves-Ferreira, M. (2019) Using transcriptomics to assess plant stress memory. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 31, 47-58. [DOI:10.1007/s40626-018-0135-0]
16. de Guedes, F. A. F., Nobres, P., Ferreira, D. C. R., Menezes-Silva, P. E., Ribeiro- Alves, M., Correa, R. L., DaMatta, F. M., & Alves-Ferreira, M. (2018). Transcriptional memory contributes to drought tolerance in coffee (Coffea canephora) plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 147, 220-233. [DOI:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.12.004]
17. Ding, Y., Fromm, M., & Avramova, Z. (2012). Multiple exposures to drought 'train' transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications, 3, 740. [DOI:10.1038/ncomms1732] [PMID]
18. Feng, S., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2011). Epigenetic modifications in plants: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(2), 179-186. [DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.12.002] [PMID] []
19. Forestan, C., Farinati, S., Zambelli, F., Pavesi, G., Rossi, V., Varotto, S. (2020). Epigenetic signatures of stress adaptation and flowering regulation in response to extended drought and recovery in Zea mays. Plant, Cell & Environment, 43(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13660 [DOI:10.1111/pce. 13660] [PMID]
20. Gallusci, P., Agius, D. R., Moschou, P. N., Dobránszki, J., Kaiserli, E., & Martinelli, F. (2023). Deep inside the epigenetic memories of stressed plants. Trends in Plant Science, 28 (2), 142-153. [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.07.007] [PMID]
21. Galviz, Y. C., Ribeiro, R. V., & Souza, G. M. (2020). Yes, plants do have memory. Theoretical and Exerimental. Plant Physiology, 32, 195-202. [DOI:10.1007/s40626-020-00181-y]
22. Ganguly, D. R., Crisp, P. A., Eichten, S. R., & Pogson, B. J. (2017). The arabidopsis DNA methylome is stable under transgenerational drought stress. Plant Physiology, 175(4), 1893-1912. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00744 [DOI:10.1104/pp.17. 00744] [PMID] []
23. Gelaw, T. A., & Sanan-Mishra, N. (2021). Non-coding RNAs in response to drought stress. International journal of molecular sciences, 22 (22), 12519. [DOI:10.3390/ijms222212519] [PMID] []
24. Godwin, J., & Farrona, S. (2020). Plant epigenetic stress memory induced by drought: a physiological and molecular perspective. In: Farrona, S. (Ed), Plant epigenetics and epigenomics (Second edition). Springer, Newyork. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-0179-2_17] [PMID]
25. Harrington, S. (2019). Understanding the molecular and genetic mechanisms regulating senescence in wheat, University of East Anglia. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/74201
26. Hilker, M., Schwachtje, J., Baier, M., et al. (2016). Priming and memory of stress responses in organisms lacking a nervous system. Biological Reviews, 91, 1118-1133. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ brv. 12215 [DOI:10.1111/brv.12215] [PMID]
27. Holoch, D., & Moazed, D. (2015). RNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 16, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3863 [DOI:10. 1038/nrg3863] [PMID] []
28. Juneja, S., Saini, R., Mukit, A., & Kumar, S. (2023). Drought priming modulates ABF, GRFs, related microRNAs and induce metabolic adjustment during heat stress in chickpea. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 203, 108007. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108007] [PMID]
29. Kambona, C. M., Koua, P. A., Léon, J. & Ballvora, A. (2023). Stress memory and its regulation in plants experiencing recurrent drought conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 136(2), 26. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-023-04313-1] [PMID] []
30. Khan, A., & Zinta, G. (2016). Drought stress and chromatin: an epigenetic perspective. In: Hossain, M. A., Wani, S. H., Bhattacharjee, S., Burritt, D. J., Tran, L. P. (Eds), Drought stress tolerance in plants, vol 2. (pp. 571-586). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32423-4_21 [DOI:10.1007/978-3- 319-32423-4_21]
31. Kim, J. M., To, T. K., Ishida, J., Matsui, A., Kimura, H., & Seki, M. (2012). Transition of chromatin status during the process of recovery from drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology, 53, 847-856. [DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcs053] [PMID]
32. Koc, A., Markovic, D., Ninkovic, V., & Martinez, G. (2020). Molecular mechanisms regulating priming and stress memory. In: Priming-mediated Stress and Cross-Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. (pp. 247-265). Academic Press. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-817892-8.00016-7]
33. Kong, L., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Chang, C. (2020). Insight into the role of epigenetic processes in abiotic and biotic stress response in wheat and barley. International journal of molecular sciences, 21 (4), 1480. [DOI:10.3390/ijms21041480] [PMID] []
34. Kou, S., Gu, Q., Duan, L., Liu, G., Yuan, P., Li, H., Wu, Z., Liu, W., Huang, P., & Liu, L. (2021). Genome-wide bisulphite sequencing uncovered the contribution of DNA methylation to rice short-term drought memory formation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 2903-2917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10483-3 [DOI:10. 1007/s00344-021-10483-3]
35. Leng, P., & Zhao, J. (2020). Transcription factors as molecular switches to regulate drought adaptation in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 133, 1455-1465. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-019-03494-y] [PMID]
36. Li, P., Yang, H., Wang, L., Liu, H., Huo, H., Zhang, C., Liu, A., Zhu, A., Hu, J., Lin, Y., & Liu, L. (2019). Physiological and transcriptome analyses reveal short-term responses and formation of memory under drought stress in rice. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00055 [DOI:10.3389/fgene. 2019.00055] [PMID] []
37. Liu, H., Able, A. J., & Able, J. A. (2021a). Priming crops for the future: rewiring stress memory. Trends in Plant Sciebnce, 27(7), 699-716. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.11.015 [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.11.015] [PMID]
38. Liu, H., Able, A. J., & Able, J. A. (2021b). Small RNAs and their targets are associated with the transgenerational effects of water-deficit stress in durum wheat. Scientific Reports, 11, 3613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83074-7 [DOI:10.1038/ s41598-021-83074-7] [PMID] []
39. Liu, N., Ding, Y., Fromm, M., & Avramova, Z. (2014). Different gene-specific mechanisms determine the 'revised-response' memory transcription patterns of a subset of A. thaliana dehydration stress responding genes. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, 5556-5566. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gku220] [PMID] []
40. Luo, L., Zheng, Y., Gao, Z., Chen, Q., Kong, X., & Yang, Y. (2020). Grafting improves drought stress memory by increasing the P5CS1 gene expression in Brassica rapa. Plant and Soil, 452, 61-72. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11104-020-04547-8 [DOI:10.1007/s11104-020-04547-8]
41. Mahmood, T., Khalid, S., Abdullah, M., Ahmed, Z., Shah, M. K. N., Ghafoor, A., & Du, X. (2020). Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells, 9, 105. [DOI:10.3390/cells9010105] [PMID] []
42. Manna, M., Thakur, T., Chirom, O., Mandlik, R., Deshmukh, R., & Salvi, P. (2021). Transcription factors as key molecular target to strengthen the drought stress tolerance in plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 172 (2), 847-868. [DOI:10.1111/ppl.13268] [PMID]
43. Margay, A. R., Mehmood, A., & Bashir, L. (2024). Review on Hormonal Regulation of Drought Stress Response in Plants. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 36(8), 902-916. https://www.sdiarticle5.com/review-history/119983 [DOI:10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i84921]
44. Melnyk, C. W., Molnar, A., & Baulcombe, D. C. (2011). Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing signals. EMBO Journal, 30(17), 3553-3563. [DOI:10.1038/emboj.2011.274] [PMID] []
45. Mozgova, I., Mikulski, P., Pecinka, A., & Farrona, S. (2019). Epigenetic mechanisms of abiotic stress response and memory in plants. In: Alvarez-Venegas, R., De-la-Peña, C., Casas-Mollano, J. A. (Eds), Epigenetics in plants of agronomic importance: fundamentals and applications. (pp. 1-64). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14760-0_1 [DOI:10. 1007/978-3-030-14760-0_1]
46. Neves, D. M., Almeida, L. A. D. H., Santana-Vieira, D. D. S., Freschi, L., Ferreira, C. F., Soares Filho, W. D. S., Costa, M. G. C., Micheli, F., Coelho Filho, M. A., & Gesteira, A. D. S. (2017). Recurrent water deficit causes epigenetic and hormonal changes in citrus plants. Scientific Reports, 7, 13684. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-017-14161-x [DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14161-x] [PMID] []
47. Nguyen, N. H., Vu, N. T., & Cheong, J. J. (2022). Transcriptional stress memory and transgenerational inheritance of drought tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Science, 23(21), 12918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112918 [DOI:10.3390/ijms232112 918] [PMID] []
48. Oberkofler, V., Pratx, L., & B¨ aurle, I. (2021). Epigenetic regulation of abiotic stress memory: maintaining the good things while they last. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 61, 102007. [DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102007] [PMID] []
49. Rajak, J. (2021). A preliminary review on impact of climate change and our environment with reference to global warming. International Journal of Environmental Science, 10, 11-14.
50. Ramirez, D. A., Rolando, J. L., Yactayo, W., Monneveux, P., Mares, V., & Quiroz, R. (2015). Improving potato drought tolerance through the induction of long-term water stress memory. Plant Science, 238, 26-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.05.016] [PMID]
51. Rashid, M. M., Vaishnav, A., Verma, R. K., Sharma, P., Suprasanna, P., & Gaur, R. (2022). Epigenetic regulation of salinity stress responses in cereals. Molecular Biology Reports, 49 (1): 761-772. [DOI:10.1007/s11033-021-06922-9] [PMID]
52. Saeed, F., Chaudhry, U. K., Bakhsh, A., Raza, A., Saeed, Y., Bohra, A., & Varshney, R. K. (2022). Moving beyond DNA sequence to improve plant stress responses. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 874648. [DOI:10.3389/fgene.2022.874648] [PMID] []
53. Saeidnia, F., & Hamid, R. 2024. Drought stress memory and its relationship with morpho-physiological, biochemical and molecular changes in crop plants. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 26(1), 71-93. (In Persian).
54. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., & Hosseini, E. (2023a). Simultaneous effect of water deficit and mating systems in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare mill.): Genetics of phytochemical compositions and drought tolerance. Agricultural Water Management, 277, 108122. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108122 [DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108122]
55. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., & Mirlohi, A. (2021). Marker-trait association analysis for drought tolerance in smooth bromegrass. BMC Plant Biology, 21, 116. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/s12870- 021- 02891-0 [DOI:10.1186/s12870-021-02891-0] [PMID] []
56. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., & Bahrami, S. (2019). Inheritance and combining ability of persistence and drought recovery in smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis L.). Euphytica, 215, 177. https://doi.org/ s10681-019-2500-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2500-8 [DOI:s10681-019-2500-8]
57. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., Spanani, S., Karami, Z., & Abdollahi Bakhtiari, M. (2020a). A genetic view on the role of prolonged drought stress and mating systems on post-drought recovery, persistence and drought memory of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Euphytica, 216, 91. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-020-02624-8]
58. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Spanani, S., Abdollahi Bakhtiari, M., Karami, Z., & Hughes, N. (2020b). Genotypic-specific responses caused by prolonged drought stress in smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis): Interactions with mating systems. Plant Breeding, 139, 1029-1041. doi:10.1111/pbr.12846 [DOI:10.1111/pbr.12846]
59. Saeidnia, F., Shoormij, F., Mirlohi, A., Soleimani Kartalaei, E., Mohammadi, M., & Sabzalian, M. R. (2023b). Drought adaptability of different subspecies of tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum) under contrasting moisture conditions: Association with solvent retention capacity and quality-related traits. PLoS ONE, 18(2), e0275412. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275412] [PMID] []
60. Santos-Rosa, H., Schneider, R., Bannister, A. J., Sherriff, J., Bernstein, B. E., Emre, N. T., Schreiber, S. L., Mellor, J., & Kouzarides, T. (2002). Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3. Nature, 419, 407-411. [DOI:10.1038/nature01080] [PMID]
61. Savvides, A., Ali, S., Tester, M., & Fotopoulos, V. (2016). Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: mission possible? Trends in Plant Science, 21, 329-340. [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.11.003] [PMID]
62. Sharif, I., Aleem, S., Junaid, J. A., Ali, Z., Aleem, M., Shahzad, R., Farooq, J., Khan, M. I., Arshad, W., & Ellahi, F. (2024). Multiomics approaches to explore drought tolerance in cotton. Journal of Cotton Research, 7(1), 32. [DOI:10.1186/s42397-024-00193-y]
63. Sharma, M., Kumar, P., Verma, V., Sharma, R., Bhargava, B., & Irfan, M. (2022). Understanding plant stress memory response for abiotic stress resilience: Molecular insights and prospects. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 179, 10-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.004] [PMID]
64. Shi, M., Wang, C., Wang, P., Zhang, M., & Liao, W. (2022). Methylation in DNA, histone, and RNA during flowering under stress condition: A review. Plant Science, 324, 111431. [DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111431] [PMID]
65. Singh, P., & Roberts, M. R. (2015). Keeping it in the family: transgenerational memories of plant defense. In: CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture. Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 10, 26. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/75338
66. Singroha, G., & Sharma, P. (2019). Epigenetic modifications in plants under abiotic stress. In: Meccariello, R. (Ed), Epigenetics. (pp. 1-14). IntechOpen, London. [DOI:10.5772/intechopen.84455] [PMID] []
67. Song, J., Angel, A., Howard, M., & Dean, C. (2012). Vernalization-a cold-induced epigenetic switch. Journal of Cell Science, 125, 3723-3731. [DOI:10.1242/jcs.084764] [PMID]
68. Stief, A., Brzezinka, K., L¨ make, J., & B¨ aurle, I. (2014). Epigenetic responses to heat stress at different time scales and the involvement of small RNAs. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 9, e970430. [DOI:10.4161/15592316.2014.970430] [PMID] []
69. Sung, S., & Amasino, R. M. (2004). Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature, 427, 159-164. [DOI:10.1038/nature02195] [PMID]
70. Talbert, P. B., & Henikoff, S. (2014). Environmental responses mediated by histone variants. Trends in Cell Biology, 24, 642-650. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.07.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.07.006] [PMID]
71. Ton, J., Jakab, G., Toquin, V., Flors, V., Iavicoli, A., Maeder, M. N., M'etraux, J. P., & Mauch Mani, B. (2005). Dissecting the β-aminobutyric acid-induced priming phenomenon in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 17, 987-999. [DOI:10.1105/tpc.104.029728] [PMID] []
72. Tsuji, H., Saika, H., Tsutsumi, N., Hirai, A., & Nakazono, M. (2006). Dynamic and reversible changes in histone H3-Lys4 methylation and H3 acetylation occurring at submergence-inducible genes in rice. Plant and cell physiology, 47 (7), 995-1003. [DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcj072] [PMID]
73. Virlouvet, L., Avenson, T. J., Du, Q., Zhang, C., Liu, N., Fromm, M., Avramova, Z., & Russo, S. E. (2018). Dehydration stress memory: gene networks linked to physiological responses during repeated stresses of Zea mays. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1058. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2018.01058] [PMID] []
74. Vyse, K., Faivre, L., Romich, M., Pagter, M., Schubert, D., Hincha, D. K., & Zuther, E. (2020). Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation and transcriptional memory of chromatin regulators in response to low temperature. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 39. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00039 [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.00039] [PMID] []
75. Widiez, T., Symeonidi, A., Luo, C., Lam, E., Lawton, M., & Rensing, S. A. (2014). The chromatin landscape of the moss Physcomitrella patens and its dynamics during development and drought stress. Plant Journal, 79, 67-81. [DOI:10.1111/tpj.12542] [PMID]
76. Wojtyla, Ł., Paluch-Lubawa, E., Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E., & Garnczarska, M. (2020). Drought stress memory and subsequent drought stress tolerance in plants. (pp. 115-131). In: Hossain, M. A et al. (Eds), Priming-mediated stress and cross-stress tolerance in crop plants. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817892-8.00007-6 [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-817892-8. 00007-6]
77. Yin, M., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Wei, R., Liang, Y., Zuo, L., Huo, M., Huang, Z., Lang, J., & Zhao, X. (2024). Impact of Abiotic Stress on Rice and the Role of DNA Methylation in Stress Response Mechanisms. Plants, 13 (19), 2700. [DOI:10.3390/plants13192700] [PMID] []
78. Zentner, G. E., & Henikoff, S. (2013). Regulation of nucleosome dynamics by histone modifications. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 20, 259-266. https:// doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2470 [DOI:10.1038/nsmb.2470] [PMID]
79. Zhang, C., Tang, G., Peng, X., Sun, F., Liu, S., & Xi, Y. (2018). Long noncoding RNAs of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in multiple dehydration stresses. BMC Plant Biology, 18, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1288-3 [DOI:10.1186/ s12870-018-1288-3] [PMID] []
80. Zhang, C. Y., Wang, N. N., Zhang, Y. H., Feng, Q. Z., Yang, C. W., & Liu, B. (2013). DNA methylation involved in proline accumulation in response to osmotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa). Genetics and Molecular Research, 12(2), 1269-1277. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.April.17.5 [DOI:10.4238/2013.april.17.5] [PMID]
81. Zhang, C., Tang, G., Peng, X., Sun, F., Liu, S., & Xi, Y. (2018). Long noncoding RNAs of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in multiple dehydration stresses. BMC Plant Biology, 18, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1288-3 [DOI:10.1186/ s12870-018-1288-3] [PMID] []
82. Zhao, T., Zhan, Z., & Jiang, D. (2019). Histone modifications and their regulatory roles in plant development and environmental memory. Journal of genetics and genomics, 46 (10), 467-476. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgg.2019.09.005] [PMID]
83. Zheng, X., Chen, L., Li, M., Lou, Q., Xia, H., Wang, P., Li, T., Liu, H., & Luo, L. (2013). Transgenerational variations in DNA methylation induced by drought stress in two rice varieties with distinguished difference to drought resistance. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080253 [DOI:10.1371/ journal. pone.0080253] [PMID] []
84. Zheng, X., Chen, L., Xia, H., Wei, H., Lou, Q., Li, M., Li, T., & Luo, L. (2017). Transgenerational epimutations induced by multi-generation drought imposition mediate rice plant's adaptation to drought condition. Scientific Reports, 7, 39843. [DOI:10.1038/srep39843] [PMID] []
ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله
نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

CAPTCHA



XML   English Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hamid R, Saeidnia F. The role of Stress Memory in the Adaptation of Plants to Drought Stress Conditions: Molecular Approaches and Perspectives. gebsj 2024; 13 (1) :128-140
URL: http://gebsj.ir/article-1-489-fa.html

حمید رسمیه، سعیدنیا فاطمه. نقش حافظه تنش در تطبیق گیاهان به شرایط تنش خشکی: رویکردها و چشم اندازهای مولکولی. مهندسی ژنتیک و ایمنی زیستی. 1403; 13 (1) :128-140

URL: http://gebsj.ir/article-1-489-fa.html



بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.
دوره 13، شماره 1 - ( 3-1403 ) برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
دوفصل نامه علمی-پژوهشی مهندسی ژنتیک و ایمنی زیستی Genetic Engineering and Biosafety Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732