1. Abdelraheem, A., Adams, N., & Zhang, J. (2020). Effects of drought on agronomic and fiber quality in an introgressed backcross inbred line population of Upland cotton under field conditions. Field Crops Research, 254, 107850. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107850]

2. Abdelraheem, A., Esmaeili, N., O' Connell, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. Industrial Crops and Products, 130, 118-129. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.070]

3. Ahmad, A., Aslam, Z., Hussain, S., Bibi, A., Khaliq, A., Javed, T., Hussain, S., Alotaibi, S. S., Kalaji, H. M., Telesinski, A., & Iwai, C. B. (2022). Rice straw vermicompost enriched with cellulolytic microbe sameliorate the negative effect of drought in wheat through modulating the morpho-physiological attributes. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 902999. [DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2022.902999]

4. Ahmed, M., Shahid, A. A., Akhtar, S., Latif, A., udDin, S., Fanglu, M., Rao, A. Q., Sarwar, M. B., Husnain, T., & Xuede, W. (2018). Sucrose synthase genes: A way forward for cotton fiber improvement. Biologia, 73 (7), 703-713. [DOI:10.2478/s11756-018-0078-6]

5. Anwar, M., Saleem, M. A., Dan, M., Malik, W., Ul-Allah, S., Ahmad, M. Q., & Hu, Z. (2022). Morphological, physiological and molecular assessment of cotton for drought tolerance under field conditions. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 29 (1), 444-452. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107861]

6. Ariano, A. P. R., Pessoa, M. J. G., Ribeiro-Junior, N. G., Eisenlohr, P. V., & da Silva, I. V. (2022). Structural leaf attributes indicate different degrees of xeromorphism: New discoveries in co-occurring species of savanna and forest formations. Flora, 286, 151972. [DOI:10.1016/j.flora.2021.151972]

7. Asif, M., Khan, A. A., Cheema, H. M. N., Khan, S. H., & Iqbal, Z. (2022). Genetic variability in diverse cotton germplasm for drought tolerance. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 59 (1), 63-74. [DOI:10.21162/PAKJAS/22.531]

8. Baldi, P., & La Porta, N. (2022). Toward the genetic improvement of drought tolerance in conifers: An integrated approach. Forests, 13 (12), 2016. [DOI:10.3390/f13122016]

9. Batool, T., Ali, S., Seleiman, M. F., Naveed, N. H., Ali, A., Ahmed, K., Abid, M., Rizwan, M., Shahid, M. R., & Alotaibi, M. (2020). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities. Scientific Reports, 10, 1-19. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-73489-z] [PMID] [PMCID]

10. Carvalho, M. D. (2008). Drought stress and reactive oxygen species. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 3, 156-165. [DOI:10.4161/psb.3.3.5536] [PMID] [PMCID]

11. Chattha, M. S., Ali, Q., Haroon, M., Afzal, M. J., Javed, T., Hussain, S., Mahmood, T., Solanki, M. K., Umar, A., Abbas, W., & Nasar, S. (2022). Enhancement of nitrogen use efficiency through agronomic and molecular based approaches in cotton. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 994306. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.994306] [PMID] [PMCID]

12. Cui, M., Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Xu, Z., Zhu, Z., Duan, F., & Wu, R. (2011). Induced over-expression of the transcription factor OsDREB2A improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 49, 1384-1391. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.09.012] [PMID]

13. Das, R., & Mondal, S. K. (2021). Plant miRNAs: Biogenesis and its functional validation to combat drought stress with special focus on maize. Plant Gene, 27, 100294. [DOI:10.1016/j.plgene.2021.100294]

14. Dorman, S. J., Taylor, S. V., Malone, S., Roberts, P. M., Greene, J. K., Reisig, D. D., & Huseth, A. S. (2022). Sampling optimization and crop interface effects on Lygus lineolaris populations in southeastern USA cotton. Insects, 13 (1), 88. [DOI:10.3390/insects13010088] [PMID] [PMCID]

15. Drwish, A. S., Fergani, M. A., Hamoda, S. A., & El-temsah, M. E. (2022). Effect of drought tolerance inducers on growth, productivity and some chemical properties of cotton under prolonging irrigation intervals. Egyptian Journal of Botany, 63 (1), 113-127. [DOI:10.21608/ejbo.2022.150010.2041]

16. Ergashovich, K. A., Azamatovna, B. Z., Toshtemirovna, N. U., & Rakhimovna, A. K. (2020). Ecophysiological effects of water deficiency on cotton varieties. Journal of Critical Review, 7 (9), 244-246. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.52 [DOI:10.31838/jcr.07.09.52]

17. Fadiji, A. E., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., Santos-Villalobos, S. D. L., Santoyo, G., & Babalola, O. O. (2022). Recent developments in the application of plant growth-promoting drought adaptive rhizobacteria for drought mitigation. Plants, 11 (22), 3090. [DOI:10.3390/plants11223090] [PMID] [PMCID]

18. Fang, Y., Liao, K., Du, H., Xu, Y., Song, H., Li, X., & Xiong, L. (2015). A stress responsive NAC transcription factor SNAC3 confers heat and drought tolerance through modulation of reactive oxygen species in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66, 6803-6817. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erv386] [PMID] [PMCID]

19. Gao, L., Li, Y., Shen, Z., & Han, R. (2018). Responses of He-Ne laser on agronomic traits and the crosstalk between UVR8 signaling and phytochrome B signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to supplementary ultraviolet-B (UV-B) stress. Protoplasma, 255, 761-771. [DOI:10.1007/s00709-017-1184-y] [PMID]

20. Geng, K., Zhang, Y., Lv, D., Li, D., & Wang, Z. (2022). Effects of water stress on the sugar accumulation and organic acid changes in Cabernet Sauvign on grape berries. Horticultural Science, 49 (3), 164-178. [DOI:10.17221/23/2021-HORTSCI]

21. Gholami, R., Fahadi Hoveizeh, N., Zahedi, S. M., Gholami, H., & Carillo, P. (2022). Effect of three water-regimes on morpho-physiological, biochemical and yield responses of local and foreign olive cultivars under field conditions. BMC Plant Biology, 22 (1), 477. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-022-03855-8] [PMID] [PMCID]

22. Gowtham, H. G., Singh, S. B., Shilpa, N., Aiyaz, M., Nataraj, K., Udayashankar, A. C., & Sayyed, R. Z. (2022). Insight into recent progress and perspectives in improvement of antioxidant machinery upon PGPR augmentation in plants under drought stress: A review. Antioxidants, 11 (9), 1763. [DOI:10.3390/antiox11091763] [PMID] [PMCID]

23. Griffith, C., & Einhorn, T. C. (2023). The effect of plant growth regulators on xylem differentiation, water and nutrient transport, and bitter pit susceptibility of apple. Scientia Horticulturae, 310, 111709. [DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111709]

24. Guo, R., Qian, R., Han, F., Khaliq, A., Hussain, S., Yang, L., Zhang, P., Chen, X., & Ren, X. (2023). Managing straw and nitrogen fertilizer based on nitrate threshold for balancing nitrogen requirement of maize and nitrate residue. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117084. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117084] [PMID]

25. Hai, N. N., Chuong, N. N., Tu, N. H. C., Kisiala, A., Hoang, X. L. T., & Thao, N. P. (2020). Role and regulation of cytokinins in plant response to drought stress. Plants, 9, 422. [DOI:10.3390/plants9040422] [PMID] [PMCID]

26. Hamid, R., Ghorbanzadeh, Z., Jacob, F., Khayyam Nekouei, M., Zeinalabedini, M., Mardi, M., Sadeghi, A., & Ghaffari, M. R. (2024a). Decoding drought resilience: a comprehensive exploration of the cotton Eceriferum (CER) gene family and its role in stress adaptation. BMC Plant Biology, 24, 468. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-024-05172-8] [PMID] [PMCID]

27. Hamid, R., Jacob, F., Ghorbanzadeh, Z., Khayyam Nekouei, M., Zeinalabedini, M., Mardi, M., Sadeghi, A., Kumar, S., & Ghaffari, M. R. (2024b). Genomic insights into CKX genes: key players in cotton fiber development and abiotic stress responses. PeerJ, 12. [DOI:10.7717/peerj.17462] [PMID] [PMCID]

28. Hamid, R., Panahi, B., Nezarat, A., Ghorbanzadeh, Z., Jacob, F., Lakhani, K. G., & Ghaffari, M. R. (2025a). Genome-wide identification of GhEDS1 gene family members in cotton and expression analysis in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biology, 25 (1), 1229. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-025-07243-w] [PMID] [PMCID]

29. Hamid, R., Panahi, B., Ghorbanzadeh, Z., Jacob, F., Zeinalabedini, M., & Ghaffari, M. R. (2025b). Genome-wide identification and characterization of DUF789 genes in cotton: implications for fiber development. BMC Plant Biology, 25 (1), 1192. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-025-07258-3] [PMID] [PMCID]

30. Hamid, R., Jacob, F., Ghorbanzadeh, Z., Mardi, M., Ariaeenejad, S., Zeinalabedini, M., & Ghaffari, M. R. (2024c). Genome-wide identification and characterization of FORMIN genes in cotton: implications for abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Gene, 40, 100474. [DOI:10.1016/j.plgene.2024.100474]

31. Hamid, R., & Saeidnia, F. (2024). The role of stress memory in the adaptation of plants to drought stress conditions: Molecular approaches and perspectives. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 13 (1), 128-140. DOI: 10.61186/gebsj.13.1.5 [DOI:10.61882/gebsj.13.1.5]

32. Han, F., Guo, R., Hussain, S., Guo, S., Cai, T., Zhang, P., Jia, Z., Naseer, M. A., Saqib, M., Chen, X., & Ren, X. (2023). Rotation of planting strips and reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application can reduce nitrogen loss and optimize its balance in maize-peanut intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 143, 126707. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126707]

33. Heimoana, S. C., Wilson, L. J., Constable, G. A., & George, D. L. (2022). Do phloem feeders affect gas exchange? A case study of Aphis gossypii (Glover) on cotton. Crop Science, 63 (2), 912-920. [DOI:10.1002/csc2.20893]

34. Hemati, A., Moghiseh, E., Amirifar, A., Mofidi-Chelan, M., & Asgari Lajayer, B. (2022). Physiological effects of drought stress in plants. Plant stress mitigators. Springer, Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-16-7759-5_6]

35. Hernandez, A. C., Dominguez, P. A., Cruz, O. A., Ivanov, R., Carballo, C. A., & Zepeda, B. R. (2010). Laser in agriculture. International Agrophysics, 24, 407-422.

36. Hu, W., Cao, Y., Loka, D. A., Harris-Shultz, K. R., Reiter, R. J., Ali, S., Liu, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Exogenous melatonin improves cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen fertility under drought by regulating carbohydrate metabolism in male tissues. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 151, 579-588. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.001] [PMID]

37. Hu, W., Liu, Y., Loka, D. A., Zahoor, R., Wang, S., & Zhou, Z. (2019). Drought limits pollen tube growth rate by altering carbohydrate metabolism in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) pistils. Plant Science, 286, 108-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.06.003] [PMID]

38. Hussain, S., Hussain, S., Qadir, T., Khaliq, A., Ashraf, U., Parveen, A., Saqib, M., & Rafiq, M. (2019a). Drought stress in plants: An overview on implications, tolerance mechanisms and agronomic mitigation strategies. Plant Science Today, 6 (4), 389-402. [DOI:10.14719/pst.2019.6.4.578]

39. Hussain, S., Hussain, S., Ali, B., Ren, X., Chen, X., Li, Q., Saqib, M., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Recent progress in understanding salinity tolerance in plants: story of Na+/K+ balance and beyond. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 160, 239-256. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.029] [PMID]

40. Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Ali, B., Hussain, H. A., Qadir, T., & Hussain, S. (2019b). Temperature extremes: Impact on rice growth and development. Pp. 153-171. In: Hasanuzzaman, M., Hakeem, K., Nahar, K. and Alharby, H. (eds.) Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_6] [PMCID]

41. Iqbal, M., Khan, M. A., Chattha, W. S., Abdullah, K., & Majeed, A. (2019). Comparative evaluation of Gossypium arboreum L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. genotypes for drought tolerance. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterisation and Utililisation, 17, 506-513. [DOI:10.1017/S1479262119000340]

42. Javed, T., Shabbir, R., Hussain, S., Naseer, M. A., Ejaz, I., Ali, M. M., Ahmar, S., & Yousef, A. F. (2022). Nanotechnology for endorsing abiotic stresses: are view on the role of nanoparticles and nanocompositions. Functional Plant Biology, 50 (11), 831-849. [DOI:10.1071/FP22092] [PMID]

43. Jeong, J. S., Kim, Y. S., Baek, K. H., Jung, H., Ha, S-H., Do Choi, Y., Kim, M., Reuzeau, C., & Kim, J-K. (2010). Root-specific expression of OsNAC10 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice under field drought conditions. Plant Physiology, 153, 185-197. [DOI:10.1104/pp.110.154773] [PMID] [PMCID]

44. Jun, W., Ping, L., Zhiyong, L., Zhansheng, W., Yongshen, L., & Xinyuan, G. (2017). Dry matter accumulation and phosphorus efficiency response of cotton cultivars to phosphorus and drought. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40, 2349-2357. [DOI:10.1080/01904167.2017.1346123]

45. Kandil, E. E., Lamlom, S. F., Gheith, E. S. M., Javed, T., Ghareeb, R. Y., Abdelsalam, N. R., & Hussain, S. (2023). Biofortification of maize growth, productivity and quality using nano-silver, silicon and zinc particles with different irrigation intervals. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 161 (3), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859623000345 [DOI:10.1017/s0021859623000345]

46. Kausar, A., Hussain, S., Javed, T., Zafar, S., Anwar, S., Hussain, S., Zahra, N., & Saqib, M. (2023). Zinc oxide nanoparticles as potential hallmarks for enhancing drought stress tolerance in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 195, 341-350. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.014] [PMID]

47. Latif, A., Azam, S., Shahid, N., Javed, M. R., Haider, Z., Yasmeen, A., & Rao, A. Q. (2022). Over-expression of the AGL42 gene in cotton delayed leaf senescence through downregulation of NAC transcription factors. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), 21093. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-25640-1] [PMID] [PMCID]

48. Li, X., Chang, Y., Ma, S., Shen, J., Hu, H., & Xiong, L. (2019). Genome-wide identification of SNAC1-targeted genes involved in drought response in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 982. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2019.00982] [PMID] [PMCID]

49. Liu, Y., Yue, L., Wang, Z., & Xing, B. (2019). Processes and mechanisms of photosynthesis augmented by engineered nanomaterials. Environmental Chemistry, 16 (6), 430-445. [DOI:10.1071/EN19046]

50. Luo, H. H., Zhang, Y. L., & Zhang, W. F. (2016). Effects of water stress and rewatering on photosynthesis, root activity, and yield of cotton with drip irrigation under mulch. Photosynthetica, 54 (1), 65-73. [DOI:10.1007/s11099-015-0165-7]

51. Mahmood, U., Fan, Y., Wei, S., Niu, Y., Li, Y., Huang, H., Chen, Y., Tang, Z., Liu, L., Qu, C., & Zhang, K. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of polygalacturonase genes offers new insights into their origin and functional evolution in land plants. Genomics, 113 (1), 1096-1108. [DOI:10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.11.006] [PMID]

52. Mahmood, U., Li, X., Fan, Y., Chang, W., Niu, Y., Li, J., Qu, C., & Lu, K. (2022a). Multi-omics revolution to promote plant breeding efficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1062952. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.1062952] [PMID] [PMCID]

53. Mahmood, T., Iqbal, M. S., Li, H., Nazir, M. F., Khalid, S., Sarfraz, Z., & Du, X. (2022b). Differential seedling growth and tolerance indices reflect drought tolerance in cotton. BMC Plant Biology, 22 (1), 331. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-022-03724-4] [PMID] [PMCID]

54. Mahmood, U., Li, X., Qian, M., Fan, Y., Yu, M., Li, S., Shahzad, A., Qu, C., Li, J., Liu, L., & Lu, K. (2023). Comparative transcriptome and co-expression network analysis revealed the genes associated with senescence and polygalacturonase activity involved in pod shattering of rapeseed. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 16 (1), 20. [DOI:10.1186/s13068-023-02275-6] [PMID] [PMCID]

55. Malik, A., & Rasheed, M. U. (2022). An overview of breeding for drought stress tolerance in cotton. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research, 7, 22. https://doi.org/10.54112/bbasr.v2022i1.22 [DOI:10.54112/bbasr.v2022il.22]

56. Maqsood, M. F., Shahbaz, M., Kanwal, S., Kaleem, M., Shah, S. M. R., Luqman, M., Iftikhar, I., Zulfiqar, U., Tariq, A., Naveed, S. A., & Inayat, N. (2022). Methionine pro-motes the growth and yield of wheat under water deficit conditions by regulating the antioxidant enzymes, reactive oxygen species, and ions. Life, 12 (7), 969. [DOI:10.3390/life12070969] [PMID] [PMCID]

57. Meeks, C. D., Snider, J. L., Babb-Hartman, M. E., & Barnes, T. L. (2019). Evaluating the mechanisms of photosynthetic inhibition under growth-limiting, early-season water deficit stress in cotton. Crop Science, 59 (3), 1144-1154. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2018.07.0432]

58. Mehmood, H. Z., Abbas, A., Hassan, S., & Ullah, R. (2022). Socio-economic, farm, and information variables influencing farmer's decision to adopt a sustainable way of cotton production. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 10 (1), 149-159. [DOI:10.33687/ijae.010.01.4010]

59. Moosavi, S. G. H. (2020). Effect of humic acid and mycorrhiza application on morphological traits and yield of cotton under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30 (1), 121-139. (in Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.24764310.1399.30.1.8.9

60. Naikwade, P. V. (2023). Plant responses to drought stress: morphological, physiological, molecular approaches, and drought resistance. Pp. 149-183. In: Desai, N. M., Patil, M., and Pawar, U. R. (eds.) Plant Metabolites Under Environmental Stress. Apple Academic Press. [DOI:10.1201/9781003304869-8]

61. Naseer, M. A., Nengyan, Z., Ejaz, I., Hussain, S., Asghar, M. A., Farooq, M., Rui, Q., Ullah, A., Xiaoli, C., & Xiaolong, R. (2023). Physiological mechanisms of grain yield loss under combined drought and shading stress at the post-silking stage in maize. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23 (1), 1125-1137. [DOI:10.1007/s42729-022-01108-z]

62. Oveysi, M., & Ghoshchi, F. (2012). Study of humic acid role on reduction of water deficit stress effects on crops. Agriculture and Sustainable Development, 43, 12-16. (in Persian).

63. Ozturk, M., Turkyilmaz Unal, B., García-Caparros, P., Khursheed, A., Gul, A., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2021). Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 172 (2), 1321-1335. [DOI:10.1111/ppl.13297] [PMID]

64. Perlikowski, D., Skirycz, A., Marczak, L., Lechowicz, K., Augustyniak, A., Michaelis, A., & Kosmala, A. (2022). Metabolism of crown tissue is crucial for drought tolerance and recovery after stress cessation in Lolium/Festuca forage grasses. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74 (1), 394-414. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erac398] [PMID]

65. Priya, M., Dhanker, O. P., Siddique, K. H., Hanumantha Rao, B., Nair, R. M., Pandey, S., Singh, S., Varshney, R. K., Prasad, P. V., & Nayyar, H. (2019). Drought and heat stress-related proteins: An update about their functional relevance in imparting stress tolerance in agricultural crops. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 132, 1607-1638. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-019-03331-2] [PMID]

66. Rady, M. M., Abd El-Mageed, T. A., Abdurrahman, H. A., & Mahdi, A. H. (2016). Humic acid application improves field performance of cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) under saline conditions. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 26 (2), 487-493.

67. Rao, S., Tian, Y., Zhang, C., Qin, Y., Liu, M., Niu, S., & Chen, J. (2022). The JASMONATEZIM-domain-OPENSTOMATA1 cascade integrates jasmonic acid and abscisic acid signaling to regulate drought tolerance by mediating stomatal closure in poplar. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74 (1), 443-457. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erac418] [PMID]

68. Rehman, A., & Farooq, M. (2019). Morphology, physiology and ecology of cotton. Pp. 23-46. In Jabran, K., & Chauhan, B. S. (eds.) Cotton Production. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. [DOI:10.1002/9781119385523.ch2]

69. Rui, M., Jing, Y., Jiang, H., & Wang, Y. (2022). Quantitative system modeling bridges the gap between macro-and microscopic stomatal model. Advanced Biology, 6 (10), 2200131. [DOI:10.1002/adbi.202200131] [PMID]

70. Saeidnia, F., & Hamid, R. (2024). Drought stress memory and its relationship with morpho-physiological, biochemical and molecular changes in crop plants. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 26 (1), 71-93. (In Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.23223243.2021.19.1.29.0.

71. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., & Mirlohi, A. (2021). Marker-trait association analysis for drought tolerance in smooth bromegrass. BMC Plant Biology, 21, 116. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-021-02891-0] [PMID] [PMCID]

72. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., & Ahmadi, B. (2022). Association analysis revealed loci linked to post-drought recovery and traits related to persistence of smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis). PLoS ONE, 17 (12), e0278687. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278687] [PMID] [PMCID]

73. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., & Ahmadi, B. (2018). Physiological responses of drought tolerance in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) in association with persistence and summer dormancy. Crop and Pasture Science 69, 515-526. [DOI:10.1071/CP17314]

74. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., & Bahrami, S. (2019). Inheritance and combining ability of persistence and drought recovery in smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis L.). Euphytica, 215, 177. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-019-2500-8]

75. Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M. M., Mirlohi, A., & Soltan, S. (2017). Physiological and tolerance indices useful for drought tolerance selection in smooth bromegrass. Crop Science, 57, 1-8. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0636]

76. Saeidnia, F., & Najjar, H. (2024). Effect of different irrigation levels on yield and yield components of some promising lines of cotton. Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions, 14, 67-84. (in Persian). [DOI:10.47176/jspi.14.4.20922]

77. Sajid, M., Amjid, M., Munir, H., Ahmad, M., Zulfiqar, U., Ali, M. F., Abul Farah, M., Ahmed, M. A., & Artyszak, A. (2023). Comparative analysis of growth and physiological responses of sugarcane elite genotypes to water stress and sandy loam soils. Plants, 12 (15), 2759. [DOI:10.3390/plants12152759] [PMID] [PMCID]

78. Shareef, M., Gui, D., Zeng, F., Ahmed, Z., Waqas, M., Zhang, B., Iqbal, H., & Fiaz, M. (2018). Impact of drought on assimilates partitioning associated fruiting physiognomies and yield quality attributes of desert grown cotton. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 40 (4), 71. [DOI:10.1007/s11738-018-2646-3]

79. Shang, Y., Hasan, M. K., Ahammed, G. J., Li, M., Yin, H., & Zhou, J. (2019). Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: A review. Molecules, 24 (14), 2558. [DOI:10.3390/molecules24142558] [PMID] [PMCID]

80. Shen, G., Wei, J., Qiu, X., Hu, R., Kuppu, S., Auld, D., Blumwald, E., Gaxiola, R., Payton, P., & Zhang, H. (2015). Co-overexpression of AVP1 and AtNHX1 in cotton further improves drought and salt tolerance in transgenic cotton plants. Plant Molecular Biology Report, 33 (2), 167-177. [DOI:10.1007/s11105-014-0739-8]

81. Shinwari, Z. K., Jan, S. A., Nakashima, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2020). Genetic engineering approaches to understanding drought tolerance in plants. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 14, 151-162. [DOI:10.1007/s11816-020-00598-6]

82. Singh, S. B., Meshram, J., Prakash, A. H., & Amudha, J. (2022). Drought tolerant compact genotypes of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for varied agro-ecosystem. Asian Journal of Research and Review in Agriculture, 4 (2), 1-11.

83. Singroha, G., Sharma, P., & Sunkur, R. (2021). Current status of microRNA mediated regulation of drought stress responses in cereals. Physiologia Plantarum, 172, 1808-1821. [DOI:10.1111/ppl.13451] [PMID]

84. Snowden, M. C., Ritchie, G. L., Simao, F. R., & Bordovsky, J. P. (2014). Timing of episodic drought can be critical in cotton. Agronomy Journal, 106, 452-458. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2013.0325]

85. Su, A., Qin, Q., Liu, C., Zhang, J., Yu, B., Cheng, Y., & Si, W. (2022). Identification and analysis of stress-associated proteins (SAPs) protein family and drought tolerance of ZmSAP8 in transgenic Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Science, 23 (22), 14109. [DOI:10.3390/ijms232214109] [PMID] [PMCID]

86. Tiwari, P., Srivastava, D., Chauhan, A. S., Indoliya, Y., Singh, P. K., Tiwari, S., Fatima, T., Mishra, S. K., Dwivedi, S., & Agarwal, L. (2021). Root system architecture, physiological analysis and dynamic transcriptomics unravel the drought-responsive traits in rice genotypes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 207, 111252. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111252] [PMID]

87. Tokel, D., Genc, B. N., & Ozyigit, I. I. (2022). Economic impacts of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19 (12),4622-4639. [DOI:10.1080/15440478.2020.1870613]

88. Ullah, A., Shakeel, A., Ahmed, H. G. M. D., Naeem, M., Ali, M., Shah, A. N., & Hasan, M. E. (2022). Genetic basis and principal component analysis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown under water deficit condition. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 981369. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.981369] [PMID] [PMCID]

89. Wang, N. N., Li, Y., Chen, Y. H., Lu, R., Zhou, L., Wang, Y., & Li, X. B. (2021). Phosphorylation of WRKY16 by MPK3-1 is essential for its transcriptional activity during fiber initiation and elongation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Cell, 33 (8), 2736-2752. [DOI:10.1093/plcell/koab153] [PMID] [PMCID]

90. Yang, H., Zhang, D., Li, X., Li, H., Zhang, D., Lan, H., Wood, A. J., & Wang, J. (2016). Overexpression of ScALDH21 gene in cotton improves drought tolerance and growth in greenhouse and field conditions. Molecular Breeding, 36, 34. [DOI:10.1007/s11032-015-0422-2]

91. Yu, L. H., Wu, S. J., Peng, Y. S., Liu, R. N., Chen, X., Zhao, P., Xu, P., Zhu, J. B., Jiao, G. L., Pei, Y., & Xiang, C. B. (2016). Arabidopsis EDT1/HDG11 improves drought and salt tolerance in cotton and poplar and increases cotton yield in the field. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14, 72-84. [DOI:10.1111/pbi.12358] [PMID] [PMCID]

92. Yu, T-F., Xu, Z-S., Guo, J-K., Wang, Y-X., Abernathy, B., Fu, J-D., Chen, X., Zhou, Y-B., Chen, M., & Ye, X-G. (2017). Improved drought tolerance in wheat plants overexpressing a synthetic bacterial cold shock protein gene SeCspA. Scientific Reports, 7, 44050. [DOI:10.1038/srep44050] [PMID] [PMCID]

93. Zafar, S., Afzal, H., Ijaz, A., Mahmood, A., Ayub, A., Nayab, A., Hussain, S., UL-Hussan, M., Ṣābir, M., Zulfiqar, U., Zulfiqar, F., & Moosa, A. (2023). Cotton and drought stress: An updated overview for improving stress tolerance. African Journal of Botany, 161, 258-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.08.029 [DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2023.08.029]

94. Zahid, G., Iftikhar, S., Shimira, F., Ahmad, H. M., & Kacar, Y. A. (2023). An overview and recent progress of plant growth regulators (PGRs) in the mitigation of abiotic stresses in fruits: A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 309, 111621. [DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111621]

95. Zahra, N., Hafeez, M. B., Shaukat, K., Wahid, A., Hussain, S., Naseer, R., Raza, A., Iqbal, S., & Farooq, M. (2021). Hypoxia and Anoxia Stress: plant responses and tolerance mechanisms. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 207 (2), 249-284. [DOI:10.1111/jac.12471]

96. Zhang, F., Wang, P., Zou, Y. N., Wu, Q. S., & Kuča, K. (2019). Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on root-hair growth and hormone levels of taproot and lateral roots in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 65, 1316-1330. [DOI:10.1080/03650340.2018.1563780]

97. Zhang, F., Yang, J., Zhang, N., Wu, J., & Si, H. (2022). Roles of micro RNAs in abiotic stress response and characteristics regulation of plant. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 919243. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.919243] [PMID] [PMCID]

98. Zhang, F., Yao, J., Ke, J., Xu, H. E., Melcher, K., & He, S. Y. (2015). Structural basis of repression of MYC transcription factors in jasmonate signaling. Nature, 525, 269-273. [DOI:10.1038/nature14661] [PMID] [PMCID]

99. Zhao, W., Dong, H., Zahoor, R., Zhou, Z., Snider, J. L., Chen, Y., Siddique, K. H. M., & Wang, Y. (2019). Ameliorative effects of potassium on drought-induced decreases in fiber length of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) are associated with osmolyte dynamics during fiber development. The Crop Journal, 7, 619-634. [DOI:10.1016/j.cj.2019.03.008]

100. Zhao, L., Lu, L., Wang, A., Zhang, H., Huang, M., Wu, H., Xing, B., Wang, Z., & Ji, R. (2020). Nano-biotechnology in agriculture: Use of nanomaterials to promote plant growth and stress tolerance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68 (7), 1935-1947. [DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06615] [PMID]

101. Zhao, G., Song, Y., Wang, C., Butt, H. I., Wang, Q., Zhang, C., Yang, Z., Liu, Z., Chen, E., & Zhang, X. (2016). Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the TIFY gene family in response to drought in cotton. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 291, 2173-2187. [DOI:10.1007/s00438-016-1248-2] [PMID] [PMCID]

102. Zulfiqar, F., Navarro, M., Ashraf, M., Akram, N. A., & Munne Bosch, S. (2019). Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: Advantages and limitations. Plant Science, 289, 110270. [DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110270] [PMID]