[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Archive
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 2 (1-2026) ::
gebsj 2026, 14(2): 0-0 Back to browse issues page
A Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Civil Liability of Genetic Engineering Companies in the Use of CRISPR Technology
Mahdi Kohansal * , Mohammad Hassan Emamverdy
Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran , mahdi.kohansal@imamreza.ac.ir
Abstract:   (294 Views)
CRISPR genomeediting technology, by enabling the identification and targeted cleavage of genetic sequences, has created a significant transformation in genetic engineering and biomedical sciences. Despite its considerable therapeutic potential—particularly in the treatment of hereditary diseases—its application, especially in germline cells, may introduce modifications transmissible to future generations. The possibility of offtarget effects, the irreversibility of certain genomic alterations, and the potential emergence of damages over time raise legal and ethical concerns and highlight the issue of civil liability of companies operating in genetic modification. The present study examines the foundations and elements of the civil liability of genetic engineering companies in the application of CRISPR technology, with emphasis on the creation of socalled “designer babies,” from the perspective of Imami (Jaʿfari) jurisprudence and Iranian law. The research adopts a descriptive–analytical approach and relies on library sources, including jurisprudential texts and legal materials. The findings indicate that the scientific complexity of genetic interventions, delayed manifestation of harm, and the possibility of intergenerational consequences complicate the establishment of the traditional elements of civil liability—particularly causation—and render reliance on faultbased liability insufficient. In contrast, jurisprudential principles such as lā ḍarar (no harm), itlāf (direct destruction), and tasbīb (causation) provide an appropriate framework for analyzing liability and protecting injured parties. Nevertheless, the absence of comprehensive regulations in Iranian law creates ambiguity regarding the scope of liability of genetic engineering companies and underscores the need to develop specialized legal frameworks to determine liability and ensure effective compensation for potential damages.
 
Article number: 9
Keywords: Civil liability, CRISPR technology, Gene Editing, Imami jurisprudence, Iranian law.
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Divers
Received: 2026/03/19 | Accepted: 2026/06/22 | Published: 2026/06/22
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kohansal M, Emamverdy M H. A Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Civil Liability of Genetic Engineering Companies in the Use of CRISPR Technology. gebsj 2026; 14 (2) : 9
URL: http://gebsj.ir/article-1-542-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 2 (1-2026) Back to browse issues page
دوفصل نامه علمی-پژوهشی مهندسی ژنتیک و ایمنی زیستی Genetic Engineering and Biosafety Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.19 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4758